<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Tomski.com - Tom Loosemore&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.tomski.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2009://1</id>
   <updated>2008-11-08T14:55:00Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Required verbage: These are my personal views and not those of Channel 4, my employer.</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.34</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Stumbled on this while writing a speech about media literacy</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/11/stumbled_on_this_while_writing.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.51</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-08T14:24:46Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-08T14:55:00Z</updated>
   
   <summary>No, I don&apos;t know what &quot;media literacy&quot; means, either. Or at least where it starts and where it stops. It&apos;s one of those horrible phrases which get banded around with little care for precision in meaning. This will be the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[No, I don't know what "<a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media_literacy/">media literacy</a>" means, either. Or at least where it starts and where it stops. It's one of those horrible phrases which get banded around with little care for precision in meaning. This will be the gist of my spiel in Glasgow on Monday.

But while pondering why such confusion, I remembered <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio3/nightwaves/pip/0kgmz/">a talk I recorded this time last year for Radio 3</a> about how openness was fundamental to the Internet's success, both in terms of code and culture. 
<P>
<embed src= "http://www.odeo.com/flash/audio_player_standard_gray.swf" quality="high" width="300" height="52" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars= "valid_sample_rate=true&external_url=http://www.tomski.com/night_waves_edit_tom_loosemore.mp3" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"> </embed>
<P>
It's the Internet's essential openness which confuses those who've more used to forms of media whose boundaries could be clearly discerned and thus labeled, if not policed. In the 21st century, media literacy means teaching people the skills to navigate without a map, let alone roadsigns.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Beginning Again, with 4iP</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/09/beginning_again_with_4ip.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.50</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-28T20:01:15Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-10T12:33:02Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Nearly fifteen years I read am article on Tom Paine in the first edition of Wired UK magazine. It changed my life. Jon Katz&apos;s inspirational feature gave me the confidence - the belief - to walk away from a cosy...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[Nearly fifteen years I read <a href="http://yoz.com/wired/1.01/features/paine.html">am article on Tom Paine</a> in the first edition of Wired UK magazine. It changed my life.

<a href="http://yoz.com/wired/1.01/features/paine.html"><img alt="304196891_4005e00b4a_m.jpg" src="http://www.tomski.com/304196891_4005e00b4a_m.jpg" width="213" height="240" /></a> 

Jon Katz's inspirational <a href="http://yoz.com/wired/1.01/features/paine.html">feature</a> gave me the confidence - the belief -  to walk away from a <a href="http://www.arup.com">cosy career building bridges</a>, and aspire instead to build a better future using 1s and 0s rather than concrete and steel. 

Tomorrow, after a tortuous period of gardening leave, I start at Channel 4 where I'll be heading up their new <a href="http://www.4ip.org.uk/">4iP  fund</a> along with the likes of the mercurial <a href="http://edu.blogs.com/">Ewan McIntosh</a>. 

The point of 4iP ?  To reinvent Public Service Media for the 21st Century. 

Have no poverty of ambition, as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Ageh">wise man</a> once advised me... 

I can't wait to get started.

 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Met Police Crime Maps</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/08/met_police_crime_maps.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.49</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-14T15:22:30Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-10T12:33:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Just went live in beta at maps.met.police.uk It&apos;s a pretty decent first effort, in that the data is down to a nicely local level (typically half a dozen streets) and aggregates geographically (so you can see basic crime data for...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[Just went live in beta at <a href="http://maps.met.police.uk">maps.met.police.uk
</a>

It's a pretty decent first effort, in that the data is down to a nicely local level (typically half a dozen streets) and aggregates geographically (so you can see basic crime data for the streets near you, for your ward, for your borough and for London as a whole). 

I had lots of fun working with <a href="http://schulzeandwebb.com/">Schulze & Webb</a> on what <a href="http://powerofinformation.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/crime-mapping-proof-of-concept/">an ideal crime map might entail </a> while on secondment to the Cabinet Office. I was impressed with many of the people I met at the Met. They know crime data. They know geography. 

The biggest missed opportunity is the lack of proper profile for your local coppers (aka your "Safe Neighbourhood Team"). The site should make it dead easy for your to contact them, and challenge/shape their priorities.

After all, even coppers work for you...
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Setting Postcodes Free (one small step at a time)</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/07/setting_postcodes_free_one_ste.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.48</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-22T12:54:45Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-23T13:41:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I love postcodes. Nearly everyone knows theirs, they cover most locations of interest, and their dozen-household level of granularity is a geographic sweet spot. They should be seen as a massive global competitive advantage for UK PLC. So I&apos;m delighted...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[I love postcodes. Nearly everyone knows theirs, they cover most locations of interest, and their dozen-household level of granularity is a geographic sweet spot. They should be seen as a massive global competitive advantage for UK PLC.

So I'm delighted to see the <a href="http://www.royalmail.co.uk/">Royal Mail</a> doing the right thing, and allowing people entering the <a href="http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/">ShowUsABetterWay.com </a>government data re-use competition to have access to the <a href="http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/data.html#mail">full postcode PAF dataset</a>.

Well done, Royal Mail. As these things go, it's both a brave and sensible move.

<em>Full disclosure: I'm on secondment to the Cabinet Office, helping their <a href="http://powerofinformation.wordpress.com">Power of Information Taskforce</a>, for whom I've helped set up ShowUsABetterWay.com </em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>OpenTech 2008 &quot;Impossibox&quot; presentation</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/07/opentech_2008_presentation.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.45</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-07T11:42:20Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-23T13:34:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>On Saturday I gave a talk outlining some slightly bonkers &apos;future of TV&apos; ideas (aka The Impossibox) to the wondrously clueful crowd gathered at OpenTech 2008. The Impossibox is an idea for a network of PVRs acting as a giant,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[On Saturday I gave a talk outlining some slightly bonkers 'future of TV' ideas (aka <em>The Impossibox</em>) to the wondrously clueful crowd gathered at <a href="http://www.ukuug.org/events/opentech2008/">OpenTech 2008</a>. 

The Impossibox is an idea for a network of PVRs acting as a giant, ever-growing Storage Area Network with enough capacity to store - and then seed via BitTorrent to each and every PVR-cum-node- all the decent TV programmes broadcast in the UK. The launch of FreeSat makes the maths even more compelling, as (bit-level) identical copies of programmes can be captured off-air by any FreeSat PVR, be it in Aberdeen or Plymouth. Hence the cloud is better seeded than for Freeview transmissions, whose time signals will differ slightly depending on the transmitter.

My slides are below, or (<a href="http://www.slideshare.net/tomski/opentech-2008-the-bastard-child-of-baird-and-bernerslee/download">downloadable here</a>).

<div style="width:425px;text-align:left" id="__ss_502369"><object style="margin:0px" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=opentech2008etech-1215429434805283-8"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=opentech2008etech-1215429434805283-8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><div style="font-size:11px;font-family:tahoma,arial;height:26px;padding-top:2px;"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/?src=embed"><img src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/logo_embd.png" style="border:0px none;margin-bottom:-5px" alt="SlideShare"/></a> | <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/tomski/opentech-2008-the-bastard-child-of-baird-and-bernerslee?src=embed" title="View OpenTech 2008 - The Bastard Child of Baird and Berners-Lee on SlideShare">View</a> | <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/upload?src=embed">Upload your own</a></div></div>

<strong>Update:</strong> I <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/07/23/so_imagine_that_everyones_pvr_starts_seeding_programmes_via_bittorrent.html#comment-1233087">should have made it clear</a> - as I did at OpenTech - that I gave this talk in a personal capacity, not wearing my Ofcom hat. (In fact I first gave this talk at <a href="http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/et2007/view/e_sess/10186">O'Reilly Emerging Technology conference in 2007</a>, when I still worked at the BBC).

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Show Us A Better Way</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/07/show_us_a_better_way.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.44</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-04T18:01:51Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-04T18:50:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary>For the past couple of months I&apos;ve been on secondment for 2 days a week to the Cabinet Office, working with the likes of Richard Allen on the Power of Information Task Force. Earlier this week Cabinet Office Minister Tom...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[For the past couple of months I've been on secondment for 2 days a week to the Cabinet Office, working with the likes of <a href="http://www.richardallan.org.uk/">Richard Allen</a> on the <a href="http://powerofinformation.wordpress.com/">Power of Information Task Force</a>.

Earlier this week Cabinet Office Minister <a href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=2078">Tom Watson</a> launched <a href="http://www.showusabetterway.com/">Show Us A Better Way</a>, a competition with a £20k prize fund to develop the best ideas suggested by the public for products which re-use public data. We also released a <a href="http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/data.html">couple of new APIs and data dumps</a>. (<i>"After all, public data is your data."</i>)

The response has been, well, <a href="http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/ideas/index.html">really rather good</a>. 

I have but one niggle.  While Tom and I have been <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/07/04/data-are-news/">getting lotsa props</a>, the people who worked hardest and longest on all this were getting none of the credit, for the dumb reason that they're civil servants, and therefore, convention <strike>dictates</strike> <i>used to</i> dictate,  must remain nameless.

Well, stuff that. The Cabinet Office just published <a href="http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/iam/codes/social_media/participation.asp">new social media guidelines</a> enabling all UK civil servants to be normal human beings outside, as well as inside,  the government firewall.

So, Richard Stirling, <a href="http://2008.xtech.org/public/schedule/speaker/884">John Sheridan</a>, <a href="http://northkingscross.typepad.co.uk/about.html">William Perrin</a> and others - I salute you. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Parliamentary Video, done proper</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/06/video_of_speeches_debates_from_1.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.43</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-06T16:39:50Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-07T17:32:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I&apos;ve long wanted House of Commons debates made available in ways which take best advantage of the wonders of t&apos;Interweb. The accessibility and searchability of the web transforms our ability to hold our elected representatives to account for their actions...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[I've long wanted House of Commons debates made available in ways which take best advantage of the wonders of t'Interweb. The accessibility and searchability of the web transforms our ability to hold our elected representatives to account for their actions in Parliament. 

First <a href="http://TheyWorkForYou.com">TheyWorkForYou.com</a> worked its magic with the text of Hansard, and now the mySociety folk have  <a  href="http://www.TheyWorkForYou.com/video">added video</a> to the mix, courtesy of footage from <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/parliament">BBC Parliament</a> and some clever crowdsourcing of the necessary metadata.

Unlike <a href="http://www.parliamentlive.tv">Parliament's own 28-day video archive</a> (or BBC Parliament), the TheyWorkForYou video will persist, and thus our democracy is now <a href="http://www.tomski.com/2007/12/ephemeral_democracy_1.shtml">pleasingly embeddable</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wilkes">John Wilkes</a> would have approved. 

By way of example, here's George Osborne <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2008-06-05a.901.7&s=remarkably+complacent+segment%3A13725804#g904.4">getting stuck into</a> the Chancellor about a recent OECD report on the UK economy.

<embed src='http://www.theyworkforyou.com/video/parlvid.swf' width='320' height='230' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' flashvars='gid=2008-06-05a.904.4&file=5618&start=954'>

After less than a week volunteers had matched 10,000 speeches to the accompanying video clip. 

So head <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/video/">over here</a> to help match the remaining 25,000 - though be warned, it's surprisingly addictive once you get started.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Rosa&apos;s Claymation Annimation</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/05/rosas_claymation_annimation.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.42</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-12T07:35:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-12T07:35:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MfWErugHiUo"> </param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MfWErugHiUo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"> </embed> </object>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>All shall have prizes</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/04/some_dinghy_sailing_photos_fro.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.37</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-11T00:12:13Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-11T00:44:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Stephen Dunn and I were lucky enough to win the &apos;Best Cruise&apos; award for our annotated Flickr photo story of our East Coast cruise in June 2007. Not sure how many at the Wanderer Class Association AGM knew what...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><center><img alt="anglo_marine_plate.jpg" src="http://www.tomski.com/anglo_marine_plate.jpg" width="250" height="344" /></center>
<p>
<a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/inside/authors/stephen_dunn/index.html">Stephen Dunn</a> and I were lucky enough to win the 'Best Cruise' award for our annotated Flickr photo story of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomskitomski/sets/72157600482192860/">our East Coast cruise in June 2007</a>. 

Not sure how many at the <a href="http://www.wanderer.org.uk/">Wanderer Class Association </a>AGM knew what Flickr was, but they seemed enthusiastic nonetheless... ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Blogging as tool for public consultation...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/04/blogging_as_tool_for_public_co.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.41</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-10T12:24:10Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-10T12:36:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I&apos;ve spent much of the past 6 months immersed in the whys and wherefors of Public Service Broadcasting. This morning Ofcom - my employer - published the review&apos;s first phase. I&apos;m glad to say that we&apos;ve managed to hack up...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[I've spent much of the past 6 months immersed in the whys and wherefors of Public Service Broadcasting.

This morning Ofcom - my employer -  published the <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/psb_review/">review's first phase.</a>

I'm glad to say that we've managed to hack up a <a href="http://ofcompsbreview.typepad.com/summary/">web version of the review's Exec Summary</a>. This let's you link to and comment on each paragraph, as well as follow links to supporting evidence. 

It might work, it might not. Either way, it's a cheap way to explore new ways to broaden access to a public consultation. It's an idea I tried and failed to get the BBC to go for <a href="http://www.tomski.com/archive/000812.html">at the time of the publication of Building Public Value</a>, the BBC's Charter Review manifesto published in 2004. Times change, in a good way.

More traditionally, we also just launched a <a href="http://ofcompsbreview.typepad.com/ofcompsbreview/">PSB Review blog</a> so we can join the conversation across the wider web about the future of public service broadcasting in the uK.

With a fair wind, I might even get the CEO to post...

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>After a week perfecting the pump-action, today Barney decided it was ready for the video...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/02/barney_has_spent_a_week_perfec.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.40</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-15T22:09:13Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-11T00:18:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0LNWwcqPGdI&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0LNWwcqPGdI&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Don&apos;t own a TV? You might still need a TV licence...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/01/dont_own_a_tv_you_might_still.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.39</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-10T19:00:40Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-10T12:33:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Update In a lengthy comment below, Michael Sparks answers my question by making a compelling case that you&apos;ll only need a TV licence if you actually watch a broadcast TV over the net. Over on the BBC Internet blog, Ashley...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[<u><b>Update</b></u>
<blockquote><strong><em>In a <a href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/01/dont_own_a_tv_you_might_still.shtml#comment-5843">lengthy comment below</a>, Michael Sparks answers my question by making a compelling case that you'll only need a TV licence if you actually <u>watch</u> a broadcast TV over the net.</em></strong></blockquote>



Over on the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/01/iplayer_does_not_require_a_tv_1.html">BBC Internet blog</a>, Ashley Highfield (Director of BBC Future Media and Technology) says that using the BBC's <a href="www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer">iPlayer</a> on demand Internet TV service does not in itself mean you are liable to pay the TV Licence Fee.

However, he continues, if you watch a <em>live</em> BBC broadcast via the Internet (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_news_24/default.stm">BBC News 24</a> and <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_parliament/default.stm">BBC Parliament</a> are both available) then you will need a licence.  

This begs a question: 
<ul>
<li>Are you liable for the licence fee if you possess equipment which is <em><strong>capable </strong></em>of letting you watch live BBC TV channels? The <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2004/20040692.htm#9">legislation itself</a> talks about <em>“apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose.”</em></li>
<li>Or, as Ashley suggests, is it the act of  <em><strong>actually watching</strong></em> a live BBC TV broadcast via the Internet which makes you liable for the licence fee?</li>
</ul>

If the former is true, then the fact that you <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_parliament/default.stm">can</a> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_news_24/default.stm">already</a> watch BBC TV channels live over the Internet implies that any household in the UK with a broadband connected PC now needs a TV licence. After all, they possess a device <em>capable</em> of watching live BBC TV channels, even if they do not choose to do so. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/nick_reynolds/">Nick Reynolds</a>, the editor of the BBC Internet blog, seems to be <a href="http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/13/bbc-iplayer-gets-a-little-bit-better/#comment-25131">firmly in this camp</a>. 

If the latter is true, then those with a 'normal' TV set could now claim "<em>But I don't ever watch BBC Channels</em>." when caught without a licence. Needless to say, this would be a hard claim to disprove, and I'm surprised that those taken to court for non-payment of the licence fee are not already employing it as a defence left, right and centre.

Now I'm no lawyer, and thus could easily be talking tosh on this issue. 

But I can't help but wonder whether <a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/the-week/438926/part_5/the-spectators-notes.thtml">Charles Moore</a> has broadband...
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Applying auction theory to Pagerank</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/01/applying_auction_theory_to_pag_1.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2008://1.38</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-07T19:50:01Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-11T00:18:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Tony Curzon has written an excellent Open Democracy piece on how auction theory suggests that Google should evolve PageRank in the light of rampant SEO. I&apos;ve thought for a while that the equivalent would be for Google to give you...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/author/Tony_Curzon_Price.jsp">Tony Curzon</a> has written an <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/tony_curzon_price/google-deficit">excellent  Open Democracy piece</a> on how auction theory suggests that Google should evolve PageRank in the light of rampant SEO.

<blockquote><i>
I've thought for a while that the equivalent would be for Google to give you not your own PageRank as a score, but the PageRank of your next closest "competitor", or web site. You could then SEO all you like, it won't affect your PageRank, except in so far as it affects your closest competitors'. The trick in this scheme will be implementing who your "nearest neighbour" is for any web page.
</blockquote></i>

Auction design is hard, and things can go badly wrong when faced with <a href="http://www.beyonddiscovery.org/content/view.page.asp?I=3691">cunning and potentially collusive players</a>. Both black and white hat SEOs are cunning, and increasingly collusive.

No wonder Google is <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/11/so-two-game-the.html">stocking up on game theorists</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Goodbye DRM from iPlayer?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2007/12/goodbye_drm_from_iplayer.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2007://1.35</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-15T00:43:09Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-11T00:18:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Interestingly (!!?), the BBC appears to have dropped DRM from the new Flash streaming version of iPlayer. I&apos;ve got Flash v8 running on my Mac in Firefox, and iPlayer videos play aok, full screen mode apart. I&apos;m pretty sure that...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[Interestingly (!!?), the BBC appears to have dropped DRM from the new Flash streaming version of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer">iPlayer</a>.

I've got Flash v8 running on my Mac in Firefox, and iPlayer videos play aok, full screen mode apart.

I'm pretty sure that iPlayer would demand I install the new Flash v9.3 player if the BBC had turned on the DRM <del>feature</del> <a href="http://www.flashmagazine.com/1472.htm">overhead</a> which ships as part of <a hef="http://www.adobe.com/products/flashmediaserver/">Adobe's new Flash Streaming Server v3</a>.

Or am I wrong?




]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Ephemeral Democracy</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tomski.com/2007/12/ephemeral_democracy_1.shtml" />
   <id>tag:www.tomski.com,2007://1.34</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-15T00:13:25Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-11T00:19:13Z</updated>
   
   <summary>For the next few days you&apos;ll be able to see below an embedded video showing BBC Parliament coverage of one of Thursday&apos;s debates in the House of Commons. var so = new SWFObject(&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/emp/flash/iplayer-external.swf&quot;, &quot;emp&quot;, &quot;512&quot;, &quot;323&quot;, &quot;8&quot;, &quot;#000000&quot;); so.addVariable(&quot;config&quot;, &quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/emp/xml/config.xml&quot;);...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tomski.com/">
      <![CDATA[For the next few days you'll be able to see below an embedded video showing <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/parliament/">BBC Parliament</a> coverage of one of <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2007-12-13a.464.0">Thursday's debates</a> in the House of Commons.

<div id="mip-flash-player"></div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/page/script/swfobject.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
    var so = new SWFObject("http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/emp/flash/iplayer-external.swf", "emp", "512", "323", "8", "#000000");
     so.addVariable("config", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/emp/xml/config.xml");
     so.addVariable("metafile", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/metafiles/episode/b008j0gc.xml");
     so.addParam("allowFullScreen", "true");
     so.addParam("wmode", "transparent");
    so.useExpressInstall("http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/emp/flash/expressinstall.swf");
     if (so.installedVer.major == 0) { _noFlash = true; _flashError = true; }
     else if (so.installedVer.major < 7) { _upgradeFlash = true; _flashError = true; }
     else so.write("mip-flash-player");
</script>


It's good news that the BBC let us embed their programmes rather than force us to traipse off to  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer">iPlayer</a>, even if you do currently have to <a href="http://jonathan.tweed.name/2007/12/hacking-the-iplayer-embedded-m">hack the embed code</a> up yourself.

This embedability ticks off <a href="http://www.tomski.com/archive/new_archive/000063.html">BBC Web Principle Number 13</a>:  
<blockquote><i>13. Let people paste your content on the walls of their virtual homes.</i></blockquote>

However, come next week the video will no longer work (I hope it breaks gracefully) since the BBC removes programmes from the Web 7 days after broadcast - even debates from the House of Commons, where there are zero rights issues.

This breaks <a href="http://www.tomski.com/archive/new_archive/000063.html">BBC Web Principle Number 8</a>, which states: 
<blockquote><i>8. Make sure all your content can be linked to, forever.</i></blockquote>

This is a shame, but I suppose justifies the Principle's implicit order of importance, since being able to embed something from the BBC is moot if said something then gets deleted by the BBC after a few days. This is the Web. Stuff should persist.

Ah well, it's progress nonetheless. As is the quietly-revolutionary-if-about-5-years-late <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/">bbc.co.uk/programmes</a>, offering a permanent page for every episode of every BBC programme, and which now also embeds iPlayer media for as long as its available after broadcast. <i>(Thanks <a href="http://derivadow.com/2007/12/14/find-and-play-bbc-programmes/">Tom</a>!)</i>




]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

