<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Tomski.com - Tom Loosemore&apos;s Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.tomski.com/</link>
      <description>Required verbage: These are my personal views and not those of Ofcom, my employer.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Show Us A Better Way</title>
         <description><![CDATA[For the past couple of months I've been on secondment for 2 days a week to the Cabinet Office, working with the likes of <a href="http://www.richardallan.org.uk/">Richard Allen</a> on the <a href="http://powerofinformation.wordpress.com/">Power of Information Task Force</a>.

Earlier this week Cabinet Office Minister <a href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=2078">Tom Watson</a> launched <a href="http://www.showusabetterway.com/">Show Us A Better Way</a>, a competition with a £20k prize fund to develop the best ideas suggested by the public for products which re-use public data. We also released a <a href="http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/data.html">couple of new APIs and data dumps</a>. (<i>"After all, public data is your data."</i>)

The response has been, well, <a href="http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/ideas/index.html">really rather good</a>. 

I have but one niggle.  While Tom and I have been <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/07/04/data-are-news/">getting lotsa props</a>, the people who worked hardest and longest on all this were getting none of the credit, for the dumb reason that they're civil servants, and therefore, convention <strike>dictates</strike> <i>used to</i> dictate,  must remain nameless.

Well, stuff that. The Cabinet Office just published <a href="http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/iam/codes/social_media/participation.asp">new social media guidelines</a> enabling all UK civil servants to be normal human beings outside, as well as inside,  the government firewall.

So, Richard Stirling, <a href="http://2008.xtech.org/public/schedule/speaker/884">John Sheridan</a>, <a href="http://northkingscross.typepad.co.uk/about.html">William Perrin</a> and others - I salute you. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2008/07/show_us_a_better_way.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2008/07/show_us_a_better_way.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Parliamentary Video, done proper</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I've long wanted House of Commons debates made available in ways which take best advantage of the wonders of t'Interweb. The accessibility and searchability of the web transforms our ability to hold our elected representatives to account for their actions in Parliament. 

First <a href="http://TheyWorkForYou.com">TheyWorkForYou.com</a> worked its magic with the text of Hansard, and now the mySociety folk have  <a  href="http://www.TheyWorkForYou.com/video">added video</a> to the mix, courtesy of footage from <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/parliament">BBC Parliament</a> and some clever crowdsourcing of the necessary metadata.

Unlike <a href="http://www.parliamentlive.tv">Parliament's own 28-day video archive</a> (or BBC Parliament), the TheyWorkForYou video will persist, and thus our democracy is now <a href="http://www.tomski.com/2007/12/ephemeral_democracy_1.shtml">pleasingly embeddable</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wilkes">John Wilkes</a> would have approved. 

By way of example, here's George Osborne <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2008-06-05a.901.7&s=remarkably+complacent+segment%3A13725804#g904.4">getting stuck into</a> the Chancellor about a recent OECD report on the UK economy.

<embed src='http://www.theyworkforyou.com/video/parlvid.swf' width='320' height='230' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' flashvars='gid=2008-06-05a.904.4&file=5618&start=954'>

After less than a week volunteers had matched 10,000 speeches to the accompanying video clip. 

So head <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/video/">over here</a> to help match the remaining 25,000 - though be warned, it's surprisingly addictive once you get started.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2008/06/video_of_speeches_debates_from_1.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2008/06/video_of_speeches_debates_from_1.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Rosa&apos;s Claymation Annimation</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MfWErugHiUo"> </param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MfWErugHiUo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"> </embed> </object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2008/05/rosas_claymation_annimation.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2008/05/rosas_claymation_annimation.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>All shall have prizes</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><center><img alt="anglo_marine_plate.jpg" src="http://www.tomski.com/anglo_marine_plate.jpg" width="250" height="344" /></center>
<p>
<a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/inside/authors/stephen_dunn/index.html">Stephen Dunn</a> and I were lucky enough to win the 'Best Cruise' award for our annotated Flickr photo story of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomskitomski/sets/72157600482192860/">our East Coast cruise in June 2007</a>. 

Not sure how many at the <a href="http://www.wanderer.org.uk/">Wanderer Class Association </a>AGM knew what Flickr was, but they seemed enthusiastic nonetheless... ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2008/04/some_dinghy_sailing_photos_fro.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2008/04/some_dinghy_sailing_photos_fro.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Blogging as tool for public consultation...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I've spent much of the past 6 months immersed in the whys and wherefors of Public Service Broadcasting.

This morning Ofcom - my employer -  published the <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/psb_review/">review's first phase.</a>

I'm glad to say that we've managed to hack up a <a href="http://ofcompsbreview.typepad.com/summary/">web version of the review's Exec Summary</a>. This let's you link to and comment on each paragraph, as well as follow links to supporting evidence. 

It might work, it might not. Either way, it's a cheap way to explore new ways to broaden access to a public consultation. It's an idea I tried and failed to get the BBC to go for <a href="http://www.tomski.com/archive/000812.html">at the time of the publication of Building Public Value</a>, the BBC's Charter Review manifesto published in 2004. Times change, in a good way.

More traditionally, we also just launched a <a href="http://ofcompsbreview.typepad.com/ofcompsbreview/">PSB Review blog</a> so we can join the conversation across the wider web about the future of public service broadcasting in the uK.

With a fair wind, I might even get the CEO to post...

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2008/04/blogging_as_tool_for_public_co.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2008/04/blogging_as_tool_for_public_co.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>After a week perfecting the pump-action, today Barney decided it was ready for the video...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0LNWwcqPGdI&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0LNWwcqPGdI&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2008/02/barney_has_spent_a_week_perfec.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2008/02/barney_has_spent_a_week_perfec.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Don&apos;t own a TV? You might still need a TV licence...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<u><b>Update</b></u>
<blockquote><strong><em>In a <a href="http://www.tomski.com/2008/01/dont_own_a_tv_you_might_still.shtml#comment-5843">lengthy comment below</a>, Michael Sparks answers my question by making a compelling case that you'll only need a TV licence if you actually <u>watch</u> a broadcast TV over the net.</em></strong></blockquote>



Over on the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/01/iplayer_does_not_require_a_tv_1.html">BBC Internet blog</a>, Ashley Highfield (Director of BBC Future Media and Technology) says that using the BBC's <a href="www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer">iPlayer</a> on demand Internet TV service does not in itself mean you are liable to pay the TV Licence Fee.

However, he continues, if you watch a <em>live</em> BBC broadcast via the Internet (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_news_24/default.stm">BBC News 24</a> and <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_parliament/default.stm">BBC Parliament</a> are both available) then you will need a licence.  

This begs a question: 
<ul>
<li>Are you liable for the licence fee if you possess equipment which is <em><strong>capable </strong></em>of letting you watch live BBC TV channels? The <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2004/20040692.htm#9">legislation itself</a> talks about <em>“apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose.”</em></li>
<li>Or, as Ashley suggests, is it the act of  <em><strong>actually watching</strong></em> a live BBC TV broadcast via the Internet which makes you liable for the licence fee?</li>
</ul>

If the former is true, then the fact that you <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_parliament/default.stm">can</a> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_news_24/default.stm">already</a> watch BBC TV channels live over the Internet implies that any household in the UK with a broadband connected PC now needs a TV licence. After all, they possess a device <em>capable</em> of watching live BBC TV channels, even if they do not choose to do so. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/nick_reynolds/">Nick Reynolds</a>, the editor of the BBC Internet blog, seems to be <a href="http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/13/bbc-iplayer-gets-a-little-bit-better/#comment-25131">firmly in this camp</a>. 

If the latter is true, then those with a 'normal' TV set could now claim "<em>But I don't ever watch BBC Channels</em>." when caught without a licence. Needless to say, this would be a hard claim to disprove, and I'm surprised that those taken to court for non-payment of the licence fee are not already employing it as a defence left, right and centre.

Now I'm no lawyer, and thus could easily be talking tosh on this issue. 

But I can't help but wonder whether <a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/the-week/438926/part_5/the-spectators-notes.thtml">Charles Moore</a> has broadband...
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2008/01/dont_own_a_tv_you_might_still.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2008/01/dont_own_a_tv_you_might_still.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Applying auction theory to Pagerank</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/author/Tony_Curzon_Price.jsp">Tony Curzon</a> has written an <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/tony_curzon_price/google-deficit">excellent  Open Democracy piece</a> on how auction theory suggests that Google should evolve PageRank in the light of rampant SEO.

<blockquote><i>
I've thought for a while that the equivalent would be for Google to give you not your own PageRank as a score, but the PageRank of your next closest "competitor", or web site. You could then SEO all you like, it won't affect your PageRank, except in so far as it affects your closest competitors'. The trick in this scheme will be implementing who your "nearest neighbour" is for any web page.
</blockquote></i>

Auction design is hard, and things can go badly wrong when faced with <a href="http://www.beyonddiscovery.org/content/view.page.asp?I=3691">cunning and potentially collusive players</a>. Both black and white hat SEOs are cunning, and increasingly collusive.

No wonder Google is <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/11/so-two-game-the.html">stocking up on game theorists</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2008/01/applying_auction_theory_to_pag_1.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2008/01/applying_auction_theory_to_pag_1.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Goodbye DRM from iPlayer?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Interestingly (!!?), the BBC appears to have dropped DRM from the new Flash streaming version of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer">iPlayer</a>.

I've got Flash v8 running on my Mac in Firefox, and iPlayer videos play aok, full screen mode apart.

I'm pretty sure that iPlayer would demand I install the new Flash v9.3 player if the BBC had turned on the DRM <del>feature</del> <a href="http://www.flashmagazine.com/1472.htm">overhead</a> which ships as part of <a hef="http://www.adobe.com/products/flashmediaserver/">Adobe's new Flash Streaming Server v3</a>.

Or am I wrong?




]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2007/12/goodbye_drm_from_iplayer.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2007/12/goodbye_drm_from_iplayer.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Ephemeral Democracy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[For the next few days you'll be able to see below an embedded video showing <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/parliament/">BBC Parliament</a> coverage of one of <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2007-12-13a.464.0">Thursday's debates</a> in the House of Commons.

<div id="mip-flash-player"></div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/page/script/swfobject.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
    var so = new SWFObject("http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/emp/flash/iplayer-external.swf", "emp", "512", "323", "8", "#000000");
     so.addVariable("config", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/emp/xml/config.xml");
     so.addVariable("metafile", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/metafiles/episode/b008j0gc.xml");
     so.addParam("allowFullScreen", "true");
     so.addParam("wmode", "transparent");
    so.useExpressInstall("http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/emp/flash/expressinstall.swf");
     if (so.installedVer.major == 0) { _noFlash = true; _flashError = true; }
     else if (so.installedVer.major < 7) { _upgradeFlash = true; _flashError = true; }
     else so.write("mip-flash-player");
</script>


It's good news that the BBC let us embed their programmes rather than force us to traipse off to  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer">iPlayer</a>, even if you do currently have to <a href="http://jonathan.tweed.name/2007/12/hacking-the-iplayer-embedded-m">hack the embed code</a> up yourself.

This embedability ticks off <a href="http://www.tomski.com/archive/new_archive/000063.html">BBC Web Principle Number 13</a>:  
<blockquote><i>13. Let people paste your content on the walls of their virtual homes.</i></blockquote>

However, come next week the video will no longer work (I hope it breaks gracefully) since the BBC removes programmes from the Web 7 days after broadcast - even debates from the House of Commons, where there are zero rights issues.

This breaks <a href="http://www.tomski.com/archive/new_archive/000063.html">BBC Web Principle Number 8</a>, which states: 
<blockquote><i>8. Make sure all your content can be linked to, forever.</i></blockquote>

This is a shame, but I suppose justifies the Principle's implicit order of importance, since being able to embed something from the BBC is moot if said something then gets deleted by the BBC after a few days. This is the Web. Stuff should persist.

Ah well, it's progress nonetheless. As is the quietly-revolutionary-if-about-5-years-late <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/">bbc.co.uk/programmes</a>, offering a permanent page for every episode of every BBC programme, and which now also embeds iPlayer media for as long as its available after broadcast. <i>(Thanks <a href="http://derivadow.com/2007/12/14/find-and-play-bbc-programmes/">Tom</a>!)</i>




]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2007/12/ephemeral_democracy_1.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2007/12/ephemeral_democracy_1.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Quechup all over face</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Apologies to those of you who received spammed invites "from" me due to Quechup, the evil so-called social network.

On Monday I received an invitation to sign up to Quechup from someone whose instincts I (normally!) trust. I duly signed up to the so-called service to check it out. Foolish. I remember commenting on how hideous and pointless it looked at the time, and duly forgot about it until this morning...

...when it spammed all my contacts with an invite claiming to be from yours truly. Nice.

Please just ignore these emails, and accept my apologies for being foolish enough to sign up to it. <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/04/quechup-is-rotten-do.html">Quechup is rotten</a> - a form of social network virus. 

Update: And then, to add insult to injury, I send my apology email with everyone's addresses in the to: field. Some days you regret getting out of bed.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2007/09/quechup_all_over_face.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2007/09/quechup_all_over_face.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>From BBC to PSP</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In September I'll be leaving the BBC to join OFCOM, where I'll be leading its thinking on the strategic and policy issues raised by the converging digital media environment.

One of my areas of focus will be developing ideas for a new Public Service Publisher (PSP).

In essence, the PSP concept is for a public institution to be charged with delivering public value solely via interactive media, rather than via broadcast. 

The idea was first mooted during OFCOM's first review of public service broadcasting back in 2004. It has developed considerably since then, notably via a <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/pspnewapproach/">discussion document</a> and associated <a href="http://www.openmedianetwork.org.uk/">creative vision</a> published in January 2007.

I have always felt that networked media, and particularly the Internet, is capable of delivering incredible value - both private and public - with incredible efficiency. Now that a generation is growing up with the Internet at the centre of their lives, that case grows ever stronger.

I've had six amazing years at the BBC. I've worked with some incredible people. I've done much of which I'm proud. I've made some dreadful mistakes. I know I'll miss it hugely.

But the chance to shape ideas as visionary and as transformative as the PSP are all too rare. It was not an opportunity I was ever going to miss.

Southwark Bridge ahoy! 
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2007/06/from_bbc_to_psp_via_wtf.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2007/06/from_bbc_to_psp_via_wtf.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>My Favourite Charity Now Has A Website</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/">UK Citizens Online Democracy</a>, the charity which runs the <a href="http://www.mySociety.org">mySociety</a> project, has just relaunched its website after several years of 404ing.

I'm really glad the <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk">new site</a> explains how UKCOD works, who runs it, how it's structured, how much money it gets, and from where, how much is spent, and on what, and who gets paid. Proper transparency. We like.

Mea Culpa: <a href="http://www.UKCOD.org.uk">UKCOD.org.uk</a>'s 'dark' years coincided with my time as a Trustee of UKCOD. It's now in safer hands...
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2007/06/my_favourite_charity_now_has_a_1.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2007/06/my_favourite_charity_now_has_a_1.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>What business are we in, again?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>"They want to move from a content company to an audience company, giving the audiences control and learning..."</i></blockquote>

Martin Stiksel, one of the <a href="http://www.Last.fm">Last.fm</a> founders, explaining why <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6701863.stm">CBS just bought his company</a>.

Now that is <em>really</em> putting the audience at the heart of everything you do!

However wonderful broadcasters think they are at Making Great Content, this content's success in reaching big audiences came in a world of very constrained live-only distribution, where scarcity of spectrum resulted in incredibly limited choice. 

As <a href="http://www.eggington.com/">Bob Eggington</a>, the mercurial BBC lifer who launched <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/">bbc.co.uk/news</a>, puts it:
<blockquote><i>
"Broadcasters often think their popularity stems from their own merit, when in truth much of it is down to the control they exert. That control is being lost, due to the internet."</i></blockquote>

CBS has clocked the existential nature of the threat, and is busy reinventing itself, and its relationship with the people it used to call an audience.

Murdoch has a couple of years head start, following his MySpace coup.

Others are still deluding themselves that their uniquely wonderful content will see them through. 

Monks and bibles, my friends, monks and bibles...]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2007/05/existential_threats_and_how_to.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2007/05/existential_threats_and_how_to.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 22:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The cutting edge of citizen journalism, 1996 style</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="fire2.gif" src="http://www.tomski.com/fire2.gif" width="318" height="363" />

I just found <a href="http://www.gyford.com/archive/1996/www.paranoia.com/~fabius/fire.html">this photo</a> I took of the <a href="http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MWSB&p_theme=mwsb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB82964C2AAC3B2&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM">Nat West Tower going up in smoke</a> on 16th January 1996. Nobody got hurt, thankfully.

It was taken from the fire escape at <a href="http://yoz.com/wired/">Wired magazine's</a> offices near London Bridge, using a very early digital camera I'd managed to blag off Canon. 

<a href="http://www.gyford.com/">Phil</a> then dashed back into the office to stick it on <a href="http://www.gyford.com/archive/1996/www.paranoia.com/~fabius/fire.html">his website</a>, whereupon we emailed all our friends and declared ourselves authentically modern and digital, if not quite <a href="http://www.spesh.com/danny/wireduk/">bona-fide WiReD.</a>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.tomski.com/2007/05/the_cutting_edge_of_citizen_jo.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://www.tomski.com/2007/05/the_cutting_edge_of_citizen_jo.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
